Greetings! I hope your 2019 is drawing to a satisfactory close, with friends and family near.
I have been offline for about a month. I had a medical interruption in the normal flow of life, but also have been wrestling with the reality of the cyber world today. The short story is that I have had to wipe out much of my site membership. If you feel asif you’ve been excluded, please drop me a note at: email@example.com
If anyone doubts that there is a massive effort to co-opt the cyber world we who blog and communicate via the internet live in, my story may remove some of those doubts.
I use WordPress for my blog. It is ancient by cyber world standards, having first been released in 2003. The standard install assumes that a website owner like me wants as many subscribers as possible.
About a year ago, I began to get a trickle of new users I didn’t recognize. This became a freshet, then a cascade. When I tried to track back these new users, I ran into dead ends. As of yesterday, I had just shy of 4.000 bots as members. I have had to delete them all and make new users (subscribers) ask to join.
I will restart regular posts shortly.
Claire Cain Miller writes an interesting article in the New York Times titled, As Robots Grow Smarter, American Workers Struggle to Keep Up.
Yes, I know, we have been through what, three or four “computers are going to kill jobs” moments in the last half-century. Economists think those prior scares didn’t kill jobs. Miller’s article is worth reading, and it raises the issue of intellectual property.
Sure. The general thinking has been that computers/automation/artificial intelligence is stripping the repetitive, lower-skill jobs, so we all ought to go to college and get jobs that require more brain and less brawn, right? Create intellectual property, right?
Okay. Great idea. But consider the reality that intellectual property — songs, music performance, writing — is highly undervalued. And that seems to be a trend, one which seems to be exacerbated by — guess what? — the same forces of technology that are supposedly driving us up the intellectual content curve. Whether we are discussing musicians or writers or sports or (in the future) college professors, the new electronic media tend to make the few, the very top-notch (in public opinion), available to all. So the great jazzman that’s not famous struggles to make a living. Smashwords says that the average self-published author makes a pittance. The wonderful university professor’s lecture is trumped by the famous guy on TED talks.
I’m not sure what the solution is, but we’d better find one. Intellectual property really shouldn’t be free.